Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

MDP feedback, All perfect but had problem communicating business reasoning and using right words

Hello

I passed 5 IVs now for BCG and had no major comment, But in my 1st IV in final round the feedback was He would fit the team, problem solving and structure was perfect etc.

But only comment was on my communication which was had problem communicating business reasoning and using right words, and this is because he asked a trick question at last in case and didnt get it so i rumbled and said wrong hypos then i asked for min to structure and then came back with right answer but seems still wasnt synthethitic or proper communication.

Way i said it the to answer X, there are 2 reasons, 1, 2

Question is whether this is deal breaker for junior associate role and how to improve for my last MDP IV

4 Answers
100+ Views
28
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Hagen
Coach
edited on Oct 10, 2024
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | most experience in consulting, interviewing, and coaching

Hi there,

First of all, congratulations on the progress in the application process with BCG thus far!

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your question:

  • First of all, this feedback might not be a deal breaker, but it's important to address it.
  • Moreover, in order to to so, I would advise you to practice structuring all answers, if meaningful, and expressing them concisely. For example, use a recorder to listen to, evaluate, and improve your answers as often as needed to make them perfect.

You can find more on this topic here: How to succeed in the final interview round.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare for your upcoming BCG interview, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

Alessa
Coach
on Oct 09, 2024
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free

Hey there :)

The feedback suggests that while your problem-solving and structure were strong, the issue lies in articulating your business reasoning clearly and succinctly. From my experience, I would judge effective communication as essential for JAs, but it doesn’t seem like a dealbreaker if you can show improvement in the next interview. Here’s how to improve:

  1. Stay Structured: Instead of rambling, pause before answering. Summarize your reasoning clearly: "To address this, I see two key factors…"
  2. Practice Clear Synthesis: When explaining your reasoning, be concise. Avoid jargon and focus on communicating insights in simple, logical terms.
  3. Clarify Assumptions: If faced with a tricky question, clarify the assumptions upfront. This shows logical thinking even if you need more time.
  4. Mock Interviews: Practice under time pressure with peers or a coach, focusing specifically on how you communicate business logic and conclusions.

Wishing you luck! 

Alessa

Florian
Coach
on Oct 09, 2024
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 500+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU

Hi there,

It does not sound like a big enough weakness that would lead to a rejection, especially if it only happened during one interview, considering that the rest of the feedback was really positive.

For the next interview, make sure to keep your communication on point:

  • Top-down
  • Number and signposting
  • Qualification of your points

All the best,

Florian

Fathu
Coach
on Oct 09, 2024
Ex-BCG Europe/ME/Africa | 50+ offers from MBB, Kearney, OW | Personalized coaching | Free 15-min intro call

Hello there,

From your context, yes it could be a dealbreaker if you don’t show notable improvement in your final interview.

On the plus side, you can relatively easily solve this by communicating in a structured manner across the fit and case sections. Some cues you can adopt in scenarios where your structure isn’t already obvious are:

  1. Top-down comms: Introduce high-level details first before going details. Also, you should present first layer of your structure before going to the 2nd and so on
  2. Numbered lists: Adopt a numbering scheme when you need to mention multiple items (1,2,3,… or Firstly, secondly,…)
  3. Opposites: This could serve as a shortcut for quick lists when you have limited time e.g. financial vs non-financial risks

If you find yourself in a tight spot where you run the risk of being unstructured, you can simply request a couple of seconds to smoothen your delivery (e.g.,  I have a couple of thoughts but could you give me 15 seconds so I can be structured enough?)

Feel free to reach out for a brief chat on this.

Fathu

Similar Questions
Consulting
BCG job ad removed
23 hrs ago
Middle East
5 Answers
100+ Views
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
48
5 Answers
100+ Views
+2
Consulting
The downside for postpone the interview
16 hrs ago
Middle East
5 Answers
100+ Views
Top answer by
Florian
Coach
11
5 Answers
100+ Views
+2
Consulting
What does this mean?
5 hrs ago
Middle East
4 Answers
< 100 Views
Top answer by
Fathu
Coach
6
4 Answers
< 100 Views
+1
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!