Hi there,
My question regards mainly but not only brainstorming questions or short questions by the interviewer. During my case sessions I tried for myself and saw different aproaches to this, often also with the same candidate/within one case:
- Sometimes it is a really positive signal when the candidate comes up with good and concise answers to a question without having to think. It shows quick thinking and spontaniety.
- On the other hand, sometimes just giving a short answer that comes quick but is not thourough let's the interviewer think "the candidate should've taken some time to think about this first".
Another thought regarding this is whether it is better to stay with the same system and don't change with every question, e.g., always taking time first and then answer to have a continuity.
My question is: Is there a good middle way for this or is it best to stay flexible with each question and answer in a way that seems to be suitable? Are there professional interviewer sentiments to this?