Capital One vs OC&C

Question

Hi everyone, I am currently applying for summer Internships in London and wanted to weigh up two potential choices. First, is the role of Strategy Analyst at Capital One. Second, is the role of strategy consultant at OC&C.

I would like to know your views on which one is better across a range of metrics you think are important. But things like a) prestige, brand name b) ability to move into MBB c) how good it looks on CV d) the type of skills you would develop and to whom they would be more attractive for.

I understand that it is ultimately up to personal preference, but I would love to hear your thoughts on which one is preferable. Also, how would that decision change if I also had an offer from Oliver Wyman? Would that then be the most preferable?

Lastly, if I want to do strategy consulting as a full-time position, which role will seem more attractive to other Tier 2 and MBB firms.

Answer 1

Hey Krish😊,

Great question! Both Capital One Strategy Analyst and OC&C Strategy Consultant internships are solid options, but they lead to very different career paths. Here’s a breakdown based on your key criteria:

1️⃣ Prestige & Brand Name

OC&C → Stronger brand in strategy consulting, especially in the UK and Europe. Recognized as Tier 2 and respected in MBB recruiting.
Capital One Strategy Analyst → Well-respected within corporate strategy & financial services, but not as strong a feeder into consulting.

Winner: OC&C for consulting prestige, Capital One if you want financial services exposure.

2️⃣ Ability to Move Into MBB

OC&C → Easier to pivot into MBB because the consulting skillset, problem-solving, and case interview prep are directly applicable. Many OC&C interns move to Bain, BCG, and McKinsey later.
Capital One → Harder to move into MBB directly because it’s not a traditional consulting role, but it could work for corporate strategy teams or as a stepping stone into Tier 2 consulting first.

Winner: OC&C (more aligned with consulting exit paths).

3️⃣ CV Impact & Exit Opportunities

OC&C – Looks great on a consulting CV, helps you build structured problem-solving skills, and can directly transfer to MBB applications.
Capital One – Strong for financial services & fintech strategy, great for moving into corporate roles or internal strategy teams, but less useful for MBB applications unless leveraged well.

Winner: OC&C for a consulting career, Capital One if you’re considering finance/corporate strategy.

4️⃣ Skills Developed & Where They Matter Most

OC&C – Classic strategy consulting skills: market entry, competitive analysis, M&A strategy, business model transformation → directly useful for consulting & MBB.
Capital One – More focused on data-driven decision-making, financial modeling, and credit analytics, which are strong for banking, fintech, and corporate strategy roles.

Winner: OC&C for consulting-related skills, Capital One for finance/data-driven strategy.

5️⃣ What If You Had an Offer from Oliver Wyman?

OW is stronger than OC&C in brand, MBB exit options, and consulting prestige.
If you had OW vs. OC&C vs. Capital One, OW is the best choice in terms of brand, learning, and MBB exit potential.

6️⃣ Final Recommendation (If You Want Consulting Full-Time)

✅ Best for MBB/Tier 2 consulting career? OC&C > Capital One (OC&C is much better aligned).
✅ Best overall consulting exit path (if OW is an option)? OW > OC&C > Capital One.
✅ Best for fintech, data-driven roles, or internal strategy? Capital One > OC&C.

If MBB consulting is your end goal, go with OC&C (or OW if available). If you’re exploring fintech/corporate strategy, Capital One is a solid brand.

Let me know if you need further guidance! Best, Alessa 😇

Answer 2

Hi there,

I would go with OW first, then OC&C if consulting is your long-term bet. Capital One is very strong in the Financial industry, if you see yourself working for a Fintech in the future (better work life balance, great benefits and usually these are growing business with various lines of revenues). I work for a Fintech and there are several senior managers/directors that are ex-Capital One, for instance.

Consulting skills may be similar in OW and OC&C, while Capital One is very strong in complex financial modeling and credit risk.

I would evaluate where do you see yourself in some years from now to decide.

Good Luck!

Mari

Answer 3

Hi Krish,

Q: I would like to know your views on which one is better across a range of metrics you think are important.

Short answer: between Oliver Wyman, OC&C, and Capital One, Oliver Wyman is the one with the strongest brand name in strategy consulting. Hence, in general it should allow for better exit opportunities in that industry.

Long answer: Most of your points seem to be related to which company is best in terms of exit between OW, OC&C and Capital One. That’s because the practical effect of “prestige”, “how good it looks on CV”, “to whom they would be more attractive for”, “which role will seem more attractive to other Tier 2 and MBB firms” can all be summarized by exit opportunities.

Here is how you can understand which company can provide better exit opportunities in a data-driven way:

Look for alumni of the three companies on LinkedIn
Check how many moved to your preferred exits in your target region
Normalize for the size of the companies in the region

Good luck!

Francesco

Answer 4

Hi there,

OC&C > Capital One for prestige, consulting exit options, and MBB chances.

Prestige and brand: OC&C is stronger in strategy consulting; Capital One is solid but industry-specific.
MBB path: OC&C is the better springboard to MBB; Capital One is less direct.
CV strength: OC&C looks better for consulting roles, Capital One for finance/industry roles.
Skills: OC&C builds classic consulting skills; Capital One leans towards internal strategy/analytics.

If Oliver Wyman is an option, it’s the best choice - stronger brand, better MBB exit potential, and top-tier strategy exposure.

Cheers,

Florian

Answer 5

Hi Krish,

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your question:

First of all, I would advise you to wait for the results before you start thinking about a personal ranking. You may not end up with more than one offer, as much as I would like you to.
Moreover, I do not think the opinions of coaches really matter here. Instead, I would highly advise you to opt for the option that better aligns with your professional (and maybe even personal) mid- to long-term goals. In order to make an informed decision, I would advise you to do the following:
- Weigh the different criteria that are meaningful to you independently of the current options (e.g., personal growth, culture, international exposure, compensation). After that, score the two/three options based on your criteria and their weighting, resulting in two/three scores. This way, you have covered the left-brain perspective.
- Critically assess your initial reaction to the outcome of the scores. For instance, if you feel the urge to tweak the numbers, this is a solid indicator that you do not want this decision to become reality. This way, you have covered the right-brain perspective.
- By doing so, you will be able to integrate both parts of the brain into the decision-making, guaranteeing a higher chance that you will still be happy with it years later.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on your specific situation, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen