Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ interviewoffers.com) | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
Hi there,
The value generated by an asset in perpetuity can be calculated with the perpetuity formula as follows:
V=FCF/(r-g)
Where
V = Value of the asset
FCF = Free cash flow
r= Discount rate
g= Growth rate of FCF
Usually g=0 and FCF is approximated with profits for simplicity. If you want to calculate the NPV, you can then subtract the initial investment.
The previous formula for the value of an asset in perpetuity is equivalent to the following:
Present value of an asset generating FCF in year 1 and growing its FCF at rate g after that
Using the perpetuity formula allows you to calculate the value faster – which is why is normally used in case interviews instead of the second formula.
For a more technical explanation, you can look at the following link:
Hi Francesco, thank you for your reply. I am wondering, why does one have different exponents in the sum numerator vs denominator? Are they not referred to the same year in the future? In this way it seems that at year zero, while there is no discounting at all, there is a growth of the FCF. I do not get why :( I hope you can clarify this.
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ interviewoffers.com) | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
Hi there, the exponents are different as the assumption in a perpetuity is that (i) you start to generate FCF in year 1 and discount from that year, while (ii) the growth of the FCF starts in year 2. But you are right, there was a typo in the formula (should have been n–1 and not n+1 in the exponent in the numerator), thanks for pointing that out! I corrected it and clarified the points above as well
Anonymous B
on Mar 24, 2021
For perpetuity (cash flows lasting forever), this formula is used: NPV = Profit/(discount rate-growth rate). The other formula is used when the time period is fixed.
I don't think the other coaches have really answered your question. You have 2 questions right?
1) You're asking why we subtract the investment?
Remember, NPV calculates today's value of future earnings. If we do NPV we get what all of our future profits are worth. Then, we need to subtract it from our upfront investment to make sure the NPV is larger than what we're paying today!
2) You're asking why we don't do "(1+i)^n"
Then, the reason we don't have "^n" is because that occurs when we have specific payouts in year 1, 2, etc. I.e. it does not go on forever. In the case above, we have cashflows into perpituity.
#1 MBB Coach(Placed 750+ in MBBs & 1250+ in Tier2)| The Only 360° coach(Ex-McKinsey+Certified Coach+Active recruiter)
Hey there!
It's quite simple - the time frame is not fixed, so the formula which you mention cannot be applied. Be careful with such conditions while case solving, it can change the outcomes dramatically.
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching
Hi, thanks for the questions. In addition to the well-explained answers to your questions from the other coaches, I would like to suggest you the reading of this insightful article about NPV and perpetuity: https://www.preplounge.com/en/bootcamp.php/business-concept-library/common-terms-of-business/net-present-value-npv
172
64
100
Expert case by
