Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Puzzled by pricing in commodities market

Hi, 

quick question about something that puzzles me on Commodities pricing. 

Let's say the demand is 650, then it decreases to 600 (see sketch attached). 

know  that price then decreases to the marginal cost of the player with the higher cost structure (player C, so price becomes P1) within the boundaries of demand, which pushes players with a higher cost structure (D) to exit the market. 

However, I don't really understand why price doesn't stabilize being above the cost structure of the least efficient competitor within the boudaries of demand (that would be C), while remaining below the cost structure of the next player (D): meaning a price like P2. All remaining players would be better off, and I don't see what any of them has to win by decreasing the price. 

Can you help me understand?

My only hypothesis: quantities are never as clean as on my sketch, and if demand is actually 580, then competitor C decreases the price until they cannot anymore to try and regain market share, which brings the price down to its marginal cost. 

Thanks to anyone who has a better idea or can explain the dynamics better!

3 Answers
2.4k Views
20
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
on Apr 06, 2020
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi Clem,

assuming that:

  • A and B cannot increase supply, and there are no other possible entrants
  • There is no risk of anticompetitive claim for a higher price

the only reason I see not to put a price as P2 instead of P1 for C is that there would not be demand for Player C at that price level (for example because a buyer has perfect information on the marginal cost of C and buyer power), thus C has to decrease the price at a lower level with a minimum possible price equal to P1.

Best,

Francesco

Emily
Coach
on Apr 06, 2020
Bain Associate Partner, BCG Project Leader | 8+ years experience as interviewer

Hey there, 

The price is not only determined by the supply curve, but also the demand curve. It is at the intersection of demand and supply curves. When demand drops to 600, you cannot assume buyers would be willing to pay P2 just because sellers could in theory collude to set price at P2 (btw this is not allowed by anti-competition law also). 

Best,

Emily

Clara
Coach
on Apr 06, 2020
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

I don´t fully understand the problem, since we are missing to analyze a key part here: demand. Your are only providing data about the offer, but both are key. Can you enrich it?

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Similar Questions
Consulting
Expert Pricing Consultant at Bain: Interview
on Dec 22, 2024
Global
4 Answers
600+ Views
Top answer by
Florian
Coach
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
37
4 Answers
600+ Views
+1
Consulting
Question about
Exhibit 2 under Part 4
on Jan 14, 2025
Global
2 Answers
100+ Views
Top answer by
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
7
2 Answers
100+ Views
Consulting
Pricing case: approach to adopt
on Jul 01, 2024
Global
3 Answers
500+ Views
Top answer by
Pedro
Coach
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Private Equity | Market Estimates | Fit Interview
18
3 Answers
500+ Views
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!