Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Problem identification framework

Thank you for the case. its a really good one and demands the student to think beyond the traditional framework. 

I just wanted to ask around the recommendation to use the PESTLE framework to analyse the problem. I would think the following are not relevant to the analysis:

- Technological 

- Legal (not sure if this would be captured more under Political as legal aspects that people would protest about would be more related to aspects to do with governance)

Also is it okay to openly use a standardised framework to solve the challenge? Do you get more marks for having something more customized?

3 Answers
2.2k Views
24
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Clara
Coach
on Nov 24, 2021
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello Michael, 

Fully agree, that would be a very good approach! 

Try to think not about leveraging frameworks (coz none of the works by fitting 100% to a case), but seeing which pieces of many frameworks that you can see can be applied here. 

Furthermore, you can reach out to Julia and do some casing with her, as the author, I am sure she would have done this case many times and have insightful tips

Hope it helps!

Cheers, 

Clara

Ian
Coach
on Nov 24, 2021
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi Michael,

You're thinking about this in exactly the right way! 

You'll note that the case writer says “Potential framework to use”.

There are normally multiple frameworks that can be used for a given case and rarely is the “answer” in the case the best one!

You are right in your statement “the following are not relevant to the analysis”. Always make sure your framework is relevant. As such, why not use PESE? :)

An alternative framework option here that I like is Social, Political, Economics.

Finally, try to avoid “standardized” frameworks. Even when using standardized, make sure to tailor them and always flag the “why” and the “how” of the buckets. 

Pedro
Coach
on Nov 27, 2021
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Private Equity | Market Estimates | Fit Interview

You are completely right. The point of the question is that you should approach it in a structured way. 

Now, being structured is not the same as using a pre-made framework. You should NEVER use pre-made frameworks.

At least, not without customizing them from the problem at hand. 

Which means that the suggestion of considering a PESTEL framework is not wrong, but it assumes you will customize it in order to address the specific problem (adding or removing stuff from the original framework). 

Let me word it even better, because it is not about customizing a existing framework. It is about using mental maps you have (such as a pre-made framework) as inspiration for a customized structure you make on your own.

Similar Questions
Consulting
McKinsey Location Selection
on Nov 30, 2023
Global
10 Answers
2.7k Views
Top answer by
Ian
Coach
98
10 Answers
2.7k Views
+7
Consulting
McKinsey Imbellus Excel
on Nov 28, 2023
Global
5 Answers
5.6k Views
Top answer by
150
5 Answers
5.6k Views
+2
Consulting
Evaluating the Impact of 2-3 Years at MBB on Career Opportunities
on Nov 30, 2023
Global
10 Answers
3.9k Views
Top answer by
152
10 Answers
3.9k Views
+7
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!