A little bit about context:
1. I am applying for BCG full time in one of SEA (South East Asia) office. Specifically, one of the practices (still a generalist but tied to a certain practice)
2. I am 33 yrs old, now doing an MBA. I have the exact experience of industry as per BCG job ads. Thats why they called me to interview
Case & Fit
So this is regarding my 1st interview for 1st round that I recently did. I will have my 2nd interview for 1st round next week. The interviewer was Partner level eventhough this is 1st round.
The fit part was okay (I think). Your standard questions, introduce yourself, relevant skill for consulting, and why BCG and SEA office. Was 12 mins more or less. The interviewer drilled me just a bit on one of my work in the previous company.
It was a case regarding private investor wants to invest in a ride hailing company in Indonesia.
I think my structure was okay..although the interviewer did ask about what's missing in the market segment and I did answer market profitability.
The problem started in market sizing. My structure for market sizing I think was fine but the interviewer did comment on my approach that was not considering % of people who wanted to want to use ride hailing. After the remarks I included it.
However I did 4 mistakes:
1. 64x9 was supposed to be 576 but I did 486. The interviewer commented on it and I revised it ( I did think I get it right at first, and then the intervewer said are you sure?)
2. There was a brainstorming question that I realised just now, right in the middle of market sizing: why people would consider to use ride hailing? And I stupidly did not structure it and it was very plain answer: people already installed their payment (credit cards, etc) and they really need to go. The interviewer noted: no not just that, and they I said convenience, that they actually need to go at that time, and it is affordable.
3.To reach the final result, I was supposed to consider a portion of the market (since it's a company) but I forget market share. I also forget that the investor only invested 10% (was in the prompt) The interviewer commented and I revised.
After done, it was already over time but they gave me time to ask questions. I asked about prospect of the practice in SEA and we discussed a bit about my as well.
4. After the final answer I did conclusion, using answer and risk and recommendation but I think I forgot restating the question
So my questions:
1. What is your opinion on my performance?
2. If for example I perform better in the 2nd (the 2nd people is a Principal but the first one I did was partner), will it sway the result?
Thank you