Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview
Anonymous A
on Jul 22, 2020
Global
Question about

Price differentiations & brand development

I think it is quite risky to cut all the products which gross profit margin is lower than 10%, since low prices have attracted a lot of customers. Why don't we use a price differentiation strategy on "free shipping costs"?  For example, if the total consumption is higher than 30 euros, we offer a free shipping, thus this will make people try to buy more, otherwise an additional shipping cost could be charged in order to compensate us. I know this may lose some customers as well since there is a huge competition outside, but i think since the bottom line could really be set around 30 euros (to at least prevent the loss), it will not reduce a lot of competitiveness of Onlinestar. 

Another problem is, if it is possible to develop the brand up to aim for semi-premium? Because Online star is gaining the most profits from the products(>70 euros), i think the company should focus more on expensive buyers.

1
1.4k
8
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Ian
Coach
on Jul 27, 2020
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

You're not wrong. But you're also not right ;)

Never forget the OBJECTIVE.

While you are right about the risk to cutting low margin products, in this case you can only include it as a risk. It's a good risk to include, but you can't let it detract from the case.

Why?

---------------------------------------------------------

The case prompt states:

"The financial ratios have deteriorated in recent years. In particular, gross profit margin decreased significantly. Combined with a significant increase in shipping costs, this led to a negative result for the first time in the recently ended fiscal year and a resulting strained financial situation. Against the background of expected stagnating sales for the current financial year, short-term action is required

The board of Onlinestar asks you for an analysis of the reasons for the negative result as well as a derived recommendation for action"

------------------------------------------------------------------

Your recommendation to offer free shipping cuts into margins. Your resistance to cut low-margin products means you will continue to have the same short-term issues with financial ratios. Your resistance to semi-premium is incorrect because we need that attractive margin.

So, you're right, but you're wrong because you forgot what the objective was

Similar Questions
Consulting
Has anyone tried any of the AI Interview Tools for MBB before?
on Mar 25, 2025
Global
10
11.4k
Top answer by
Iman
Coach
Systemiq | Ex-BCG | 10 years experience with 8+ specialising in sustainability | Free Intro | Ex-PrepLounge candidate
344
10 Answers
11.4k Views
+7
Consulting
McKinsey PEI
8 hrs ago
Global
7
1.6k
Top answer by
Deleted user
57
7 Answers
1.6k Views
+4
Consulting
BCG First Round Behavioral
on Mar 24, 2025
Global
6
2.1k
Top answer by
Lorenzo
Coach
IESE MBA | Bain&Co | OC&C | Private Equity | Consumer Goods
70
6 Answers
2.1k Views
+3
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.