Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview
Anonymous A
on Jul 22, 2020
Global
Question about

Price differentiations & brand development

I think it is quite risky to cut all the products which gross profit margin is lower than 10%, since low prices have attracted a lot of customers. Why don't we use a price differentiation strategy on "free shipping costs"?  For example, if the total consumption is higher than 30 euros, we offer a free shipping, thus this will make people try to buy more, otherwise an additional shipping cost could be charged in order to compensate us. I know this may lose some customers as well since there is a huge competition outside, but i think since the bottom line could really be set around 30 euros (to at least prevent the loss), it will not reduce a lot of competitiveness of Onlinestar. 

Another problem is, if it is possible to develop the brand up to aim for semi-premium? Because Online star is gaining the most profits from the products(>70 euros), i think the company should focus more on expensive buyers.

1 Answer
1.3k Views
8
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Ian
Coach
on Jul 27, 2020
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

You're not wrong. But you're also not right ;)

Never forget the OBJECTIVE.

While you are right about the risk to cutting low margin products, in this case you can only include it as a risk. It's a good risk to include, but you can't let it detract from the case.

Why?

---------------------------------------------------------

The case prompt states:

"The financial ratios have deteriorated in recent years. In particular, gross profit margin decreased significantly. Combined with a significant increase in shipping costs, this led to a negative result for the first time in the recently ended fiscal year and a resulting strained financial situation. Against the background of expected stagnating sales for the current financial year, short-term action is required

The board of Onlinestar asks you for an analysis of the reasons for the negative result as well as a derived recommendation for action"

------------------------------------------------------------------

Your recommendation to offer free shipping cuts into margins. Your resistance to cut low-margin products means you will continue to have the same short-term issues with financial ratios. Your resistance to semi-premium is incorrect because we need that attractive margin.

So, you're right, but you're wrong because you forgot what the objective was

Similar Questions
Consulting
McKinsey - Strong referral one month after the application
on Jan 09, 2025
Global
8 Answers
3.3k Views
Top answer by
Expert coach | Head of recruiting for Bain | 8+ years interviewing | Free intro call
117
8 Answers
3.3k Views
+5
Consulting
Question about
Rohertragsmargen
on Dec 20, 2024
Global
1 Answer
400+ Views
20
1 Answer
400+ Views
Consulting
Bain's application process
on Feb 26, 2024
Global
6 Answers
4.6k Views
Top answer by
#1 rated MBB & McKinsey Coach
189
6 Answers
4.6k Views
+3
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!