McK - asked to reapply in a year

Question

Got feedback from my first round this week with McK (BA, target school) that I was extremely close to making it through. I was also told that they would keep in touch in the future, and I should reapply in a year if I'm interested.

Their feedback was that my initial FW was not deep enough while almost everything else, including PEI, was really good.

While my interviewer is great, I can't tell if it was genuine feedback because I feel like if I were actually good, I'd have made it through at least to a final round.

What should I make of this?

Answer 1

Hi Anonymous,

Obviously lots of speculation involved in answering, since nobody of us was really involved in the process.

In general an offer to re-apply in a year does not mean that much as most candidates would like it to be. In conjunction with your additional input that the interviewer offered personally to stay in touch and that McKinsey will reach out again, it sounds already a bit better!

Still there is no point from McKinsey's perspective to be 'unfriendly' in whatsoever way to a candidates - you don't know what future brings and where pathes might cross again in future (also possible from client side later in your career).

So take this offer with a grain of salt, but maximize your chances by staying in touch and ensure to re-apply later based on that offer (if it still fits into your life at that point).

Hope that helps - if so, please be so kind to give it a thumbs-up with the green upvote button below!

Robert

Answer 2

To be frank, it is a common way of turning down a candidate. There's a chance you could get an offer in the future with more practice and experience but they didn't see it on that day, based on how you performed. The slight nuance is whether the interviewer went into enough detail to personally show excitement and encouragement about seeing you re-apply or not. Perhaps one sign could be around whether they offered to personally stay in touch with you or not...

Specifically on the feedback, I feel the "really good" might be a little inflated where they likely struggled to see clear strengths that made you stand out from the crowd. Unless your structuring was appalling, that alone would not be the reason they would turn you down.

Answer 3

Hello!

Then they give you "no" as an answer but they invite you to re-apply means that, even though you did not meet the bar, the liked your performance.

Probably when you re-apply you will skip a step (e.g., the initial test).

In any case, it does not mean anything for next time, you will still be tested from zero and will need to meet or raise the bar.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Answer 4

Hi there,

Candidly, you should make nothing of it.

It doesn't matter. You didn't get in. Now, you need to focus on how to change that in a year (note: Everyone can re-apply after a certain period, so there's nothing "special" here unfortunately).

Build your resume//experiences
Network (again)
Hire a coach - you were lacking in some areas and it's extremely difficult to properly self-assess...get a coach to help you improve
Get back to preparation when the time comes

I firmly believe that the greatest accomplishments come from temporary defeat. So, take the defeat, recharge, and come back with a new (successful) approach for the next time!

Answer 5

Hi Anonymous!

It's always difficult to assess what someone really means in a feedback, even more so when not hearing it, but reading a 2 paragraph summary. Every person's/office's/company's style is different so you can't interprete much in this.

My personal style is to be very honest and upfront in these conversations. When I give feedback, I mean every bit of feedback that I give. So if I encourage someone to re-apply (and that has happened a few times in the past), it is because the interviewers saw great potential, but e.g. a lack of preparedness or maturity. This doesn't change the result, but it is a true encouragement to try again in the future.

Anyway, there nothing you can do about it. But I would keep an eye on your inbox. If they really stay in touch as you wrote they said, that would be a clear sign that what they said is true.

Answer 6

Hi A,

Now it is really hard to say whether the interviewer did mean what he said or whether he wanted politely turn you down. Anyway, it doesn't matter right now.

Now I would recommend you concentrate on more important things so you can maximize your chances of making it to the final round and eventually get the offer when reapplying in a year.

You should not only network hard but also improve your skillset, get relevant work experience so you present a strong upgraded profile next time, and become an excellent fit for them. Getting guidance from an experienced coach would also make it much easier to reach your goal.

Do you need any further help?
GB

Answer 7

Hi Levia, I was also not an organized person in keeping track of various feedbacks during my prep day. Largely, I... (read entire answer)

Hi Levia, I was also not an organized person in keeping track of various feedbacks during my prep day. Largely, I agree with all the points shared by Achyut and Aws. If you... (read entire answer)

Answer 8

Hi, Bain and BCG written cases include 20+ pages of documents which you need to analyse to answer a few client ques... (read entire answer)

Hi, Bain and BCG written cases include 20+ pages of documents which you need to analyse to answer a few client questions on 3 to 5 slides and present them to your interviewer.... (read entire answer)