Hi all, I am new to market sizing and would like to understand the difference between the two different set of terms that people use -ย
1. Top-down and Bottom-up
2. Demand side and Supply side
Are these the same, and which ones to use when?
Hi all, I am new to market sizing and would like to understand the difference between the two different set of terms that people use -ย
1. Top-down and Bottom-up
2. Demand side and Supply side
Are these the same, and which ones to use when?
Great question, and it's important to know the difference between these terms in market sizing. I'd be happy to provide some clarity on these concepts.
Top-down and Bottom-up:
Demand side and Supply side:
Now, to address your second question about when to use these terms:
Top-down and bottom-up approaches are both valuable and can be used in different situations:
Demand side and supply side analyses serve different purposes:
In conclusion, understanding the differences between top-down and bottom-up approaches, as well as demand side and supply side perspectives, can significantly enhance your market sizing efforts. The choice of approach depends on the specific context and available data, and combining multiple methods can provide a more comprehensive analysis. I hope this explanation clarifies these terms for you!
Hi there,ย
These are great questions!
You can understand the difference between top down and bottom up by reading the following article where I explain this methodology as applied to brainstorming exercises (it's super similar to sizing):
Best,
Cristian
Hi there,
Emily nailed it! Exactly right in here description.
Now, please try not to get too caught up in all the definitionsโฆbecause they don't matter much (and you can take a hybrid approach to them as well)
How to approach market sizing
It's very simple: Do the approach the is the easiest for you given the question.
Are they asking you to estimate something where you don't even know where to begin from the top (maybe you have 0 clue as to the market size of the industry, the GDP of that country, etc. etc.)? Then do bottom-up!
Alternatively, does it seem impossible to do a realistic from-the-ground-up estimation of something (perhaps it requires just far too many steps and assumptions)? Then do top-down!
Fundamentally, you need to take the approach that just makes the most sense in that circumstance. Quickly think about the key assumptions / numbers required and whether you 1) Know them or 2) Can reasonably estimate them. If you can, go ahead!
An Example
He's a Q&A for a great market sizing question here asking to estimate # of electric charging stations in a city in 10 years:
This one could be answered top-downย (as I did) byย estimating population of the city, # of drivers/ cars, etc. etc.
OR, it could be answered bottom-up by estimating # of stations you see per block (or # of gas/petrol tanks), % increase this might be over time (or # of EV stations that would be needed per gas tank given EV stations take 10 times as long), and # of blocks you'd estimate the city to have.
Take a look here for additional practice! https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/brain-teaser/intermediate/taxis-in-manhattan-market-sizing-229
Already great answers, so I'll just add a thumbs rule.
Top down and demand are usually the same thing. You are (usually) estimating frequency of consumption within the population. Please note that โpopulationโ means the relevant population to the specific estimate at hand. I.e. may be the country, the city, the โfootfallโ of a retail location, or the โhinterlandโ of a certain site.
Bottom up and supply are usually the same thing. You are usually estimating the capacity of the providers multiplied by a certain utilization rate (and possibly by the number of potential providers). This is more frequent when you are estimating the revenue or demand for a single site/business.