How do i find areas of partnership and potential partners

The Strategic Public Value Triangle is a conceptual framework developed by Prof. Mark H. Moore to guide public managers in creating public value. It emphasizes the interplay between three key elements: public value proposition, the operational capacity to deliver, and the legitimacy and support of the authorizing environment.Prof. Mark H. Moore is a distinguished academic known for his work in public management and leadership. He is the Hauser Professor of Nonprofit Organizations at the Harvard Kennedy School. Moore's research and teachings have significantly influenced the field of public administration, particularly with the introduction of the Strategic Public Triangle in his seminal book "Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government" published in 1995. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Strategic Public TriangleThe Strategic Public Triangle serves as a guiding tool for consultants working in the public sector. It aids them in:Identifying the value their initiatives bring to the public.Ensuring they have the operational capability to deliver on their promises.Securing the necessary legitimacy and support from stakeholders, including political authorizers, beneficiaries, and the broader public.Advantages:Holistic Approach: The Strategic Triangle offers a comprehensive view of public management. It doesn't just focus on the value delivered but also takes into account the means of delivery and the surrounding environment. For instance, when a city plans to introduce a new public transportation system, the triangle would prompt officials to consider not just the efficiency of the system, but also the infrastructure required and the public's reception to the change.Flexibility: The framework is versatile and can be applied across various public sector contexts, from local to federal levels. For example, whether a small town is trying to improve its local library services or a national government is overhauling its healthcare system, the Strategic Public Value Triangle can guide decision-making.Stakeholder Engagement: The triangle emphasizes the importance of legitimacy and support, ensuring that public managers remain deeply connected with their stakeholders. When a public school district, for instance, wants to revise its curriculum, using the triangle would mean not just focusing on educational outcomes but also engaging with parents, teachers, and students to gain their support.Disadvantages:Complexity: The intricate interplay between the triangle's three elements can be challenging to navigate. For instance, a public health initiative aiming to reduce smoking might deliver public value and have operational capability, but if it doesn't gain the support of certain influential groups, its effectiveness could be compromised.Potential for Overemphasis: There's a risk that public managers might focus too much on one element of the triangle at the expense of the others. A city might, for example, pour resources into a state-of-the-art waste management facility (operational capability) but neglect to consider whether the public sees it as a priority (public value) or if it has the political backing needed (legitimacy and support).Requires Continuous Monitoring: The dynamics of the public sector mean that the elements of the triangle can change rapidly. A policy that enjoys broad public support today might face opposition tomorrow due to changing political or social climates. For example, a renewable energy initiative that is popular during a period of environmental activism might lose traction if economic downturns shift public focus to immediate job creation. Alternative FrameworksSeveral other management and strategic frameworks can be applied in the public sector, including:SWOT Analysis: Evaluates strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.Balanced Scorecard: Focuses on performance metrics across various perspectives.PESTEL Analysis: Considers political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors affecting an organization.Logic Model: A tool used to visualize the relationship between resources, activities, outputs, and outcomes of a program.A Concept for Understanding Public ValueThe Strategic Public Triangle, conceptualized by Prof. Mark H. Moore, helps consultants in public management. It underscores the necessity of not only delivering tangible value to the public but also ensuring that the means of delivery are robust and that there's a harmonious relationship with the surrounding political and social environment. While it offers a comprehensive and flexible approach, it also demands astute understanding and continuous engagement from public managers. In an ever-evolving public sector landscape, tools like the Strategic Public Triangle remain indispensable, guiding public servants and consultants alike in their quest to create lasting public value. As with any framework, its effectiveness lies in its application, urging those in the public realm to strike a balance between value, capability, and legitimacy.

Design Thinking is more than just an approach or a method – it's a non-linear, iterative process that places creativity and problem-solving at its core. To understand this mindset, let's look at the three essential elements of Design Thinking: People, Process, and Place. These elements form the foundation for applying Design Thinking in business consulting.The Evolution of Design ThinkingOriginally emerging in the creative environments of design studios, Design Thinking began to establish itself as an approach to creative problem-solving in the 1960s and 1970s. Rolf Faste, a professor at Stanford University, coined the term "Design Thinking" in the 1980s. Evolving from a purely design-focused approach, Design Thinking has become an interdisciplinary method that extends far beyond the boundaries of traditional design. Companies and organizations have recognized that this mindset is applicable not only to product development but also to complex systems, services, business models and social innovations.The Three Elements of Design Thinking1) People: The key roles of individualsDesign Thinking focuses on people, their needs, and perspectives. People are at the center of the development process, whether it's designing products, services, or corporate strategies.2) Process: Six iterative stepsEmpathize: Understand users by observing and interacting with them to grasp their thoughts and feelings.Define: Analyze gathered information to identify user problems and recognize opportunities for innovation.Ideate: Generate creative ideas, encouraging quantity over quality, to address unmet user needs.Prototype: Build tangible representations of selected ideas to evaluate their feasibility and impact.Test: Collect feedback from users to assess whether the proposed solutions meet their needs and improve their experiences.Implement: Execute the chosen solution, emphasizing that the success of design thinking relies on translating ideas into tangible outcomes that positively impact users' lives.3) Place: The space for creativityThe physical and social space where Design Thinking takes place also plays a crucial role. Open and collaborative spaces encourage the exchange of ideas and facilitate effective collaboration. Special workshops or Design Thinking labs can create a space that fosters creativity and innovation.Key Insights into Design ThinkingDesign Thinking is a powerful mindset that has successfully established itself in various areas. Emphasizing People, Process, and Place allows for the development of creative solutions that not only are functional but also place the needs of people at the forefront. The iterative application of the six steps provides a structured path from defining the problem to thoughtful prototypes and ultimately to innovative solutions.