I have a question about the calculation of the allocated fixed overhead costs. When calculating the margin of 8% only fixed costs (Personnel and Store rent) are taken into consideration and variable costs e.g. purchase prices are ignored. Therefore, the 8% only represents the profit margin after fixed costs if I am not mistaken. When calculating the fixed overhead costs, however, the 8% margin is applied as if it represents the profit margin after all costs (including purchase prices). For me, this seems inconsistent and I don´t really understand why this is possible.
Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht
Hi,
my question is related to the calculations performed in Question 2 of the solution "Why can other competitors offer lower prices?" (page 7-9)
I can also add as per the previous comment above:
The costs of the business at the top level are calculated as the fixed costs i.e. the rent and the staff salaries. This gives a margin of 8%. This margin of 8% is then used as a justification for the profit margin of the product. However, The business's margin cannot be 8% since it also incurs a variable cost given that it purchases the product at a price of €30, as per the case notes. How can the 8% calculated as the business margin be the same as the product's profit margin?
5
4
Hi,
so my question refers to Question 2 in the solution "Why can other competitors offer lower prices?" (page 7-9). First, the margin for BeautyCo is calculated by deducting fixed costs (Personnel costs and store rent) from the revenue resulting in a margin of 8%. Variable costs e.g. the purchasing price is ignored here. So if I am not mistaken, the 8% only represent the profit margin after fixed costs not after total costs.
However, in the next step when fixed overhead costs are calculated, fixed costs AND variable costs (purchasing price) are deducted from the revenue (sales price) and equated with the 8% margin, implying the 8% represent the profit margin after total costs.
This seems inconsistent to me, because when calculating the 8% margin only fixed costs are taken into consideration, but when applying the 8% margin, fixed costs AND variable costs are taken into account
I can also add:
The costs of the business at the top level are calculated as the fixed costs i.e. the rent and the staff salaries. This gives a margin of 8%. This margin of 8% is then used as a justification for the profit margin of the product. However, The business's margin cannot be 8% since it also incurs a variable cost given that it purchases the product at a price of €30, as per the case notes. How can the 8% calculated as the business margin be the same as the product's profit margin?
Please see my new comment. I think you are right; there is a flaw in the solution of question 2.
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Hi there!
I see you received a lot of help in the meantime.
Sharing with you an additional article that you might find helpful - it's a collection of all the typical terms you're likely to come across in an interview:
Best,
Cristian
———————————————
Practicing for interviews? Check out my latest case based on a first-round MBB interview >>> SoyTechnologies
Hi there,
Really hard to assist without more information.
Can you please point to the exact part of the case where this calculation occurs (and provide screenshots).
Help us help you!
my question is related to the calculations performed in Question 2 of the solution "Why can other competitors offer lower prices?" (page 7-9)
The costs of the business at the top level are calculated as the fixed costs i.e. the rent and the staff salaries. This gives a margin of 8%. This margin of 8% is then used as a justification for the profit margin of the product. However, The business's margin cannot be 8% since it also incurs a variable cost given that it purchases the product at a price of €30, as per the case notes. How can the 8% calculated as the business margin be the same as the product's profit margin?
Thank you for your question. We have reviewed and adjusted the case. We hope it is more clear now, and let us know if you have further feedback. Your PrepLounge team
Hello,
Would you mind walking us through the calculation you are referring to in more detail? I'm not sure that I fully follow.
so my question refers to Question 2 in the solution "Why can other competitors offer lower prices?" (page 7-9). First, the margin for BeautyCo is calculated by deducting fixed costs (Personnel costs and store rent) from the revenue resulting in a margin of 8%. Variable costs e.g. the purchasing price is ignored here. So if I am not mistaken, the 8% only represent the profit margin after fixed costs not after total costs.
However, in the next step when fixed overhead costs are calculated, fixed costs AND variable costs (purchasing price) are deducted from the revenue (sales price) and equated with the 8% margin, implying the 8% represent the profit margin after total costs.
This seems inconsistent to me, because when calculating the 8% margin only fixed costs are taken into consideration, but when applying the 8% margin, fixed costs AND variable costs are taken into account
The costs of the business at the top level are calculated as the fixed costs i.e. the rent and the staff salaries. This gives a margin of 8%. This margin of 8% is then used as a justification for the profit margin of the product. However, The business's margin cannot be 8% since it also incurs a variable cost given that it purchases the product at a price of €30, as per the case notes. How can the 8% calculated as the business margin be the same as the product's profit margin?
Jetzt kostenlos anmelden, um alle Antworten zu lesen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmelden, um alle Antworten zu lesen.
